Practice MCQs UPSC CSE

Money Bills under Article 110: Rules, Process and Limits — MCQs with Answers

Test what you know about Money Bills under Article 110: Rules, Process and Limits with 10 UPSC Prelims-style questions. Try each one first, then tap “Show answer” for the correct option and its explanation.

Read the full article
  • 10 practice questions
  • ≈ 10 min
  • Answers & explanations

Answers revealed

Try each question yourself first, then check the answer.

  1. Q1. Which pairing of constitutional articles is correct?

    1. Article 109: Money Bill definition; Article 110: special procedure
    2. Article 117: definition of every ordinary Bill; Article 109: judicial appointments
    3. Article 110: Money Bill definition; Article 109: special procedure
    4. Article 111: Money Bill definition; Article 110: general assent procedure
    Show answer

    Correct answer: (C) Article 110: Money Bill definition; Article 109: special procedure

    Explanation

    Correct Answer: (C). Article 110 defines the category and Article 109 supplies its parliamentary procedure. The reversed pairing confuses these functions. Article 117 concerns related financial legislation rather than every ordinary Bill, and Article 111 concerns assent rather than the Money Bill definition. Correct classification must precede selection of the applicable legislative route.

  2. Q2. Under Article 110(1), what is crucial to Money Bill classification?

    1. The Bill contains only provisions dealing with the listed matters and incidental subjects
    2. The Bill mentions public expenditure somewhere
    3. The sponsoring ministry calls it financial
    4. The Bill has any indirect budgetary effect
    Show answer

    Correct answer: (A) The Bill contains only provisions dealing with the listed matters and incidental subjects

    Explanation

    Correct Answer: (A). The word only limits the category to specified Article 110 matters and their incidental subjects. A financial reference, ministerial label or indirect budgetary effect cannot independently satisfy that test. Those alternatives replace the constitutional subject-matter requirement with much broader indicators and would incorrectly classify many other kinds of legislation.

  3. Q3. Consider these statements: 1. A licence fee alone necessarily makes a Bill a Money Bill. 2. Fines or pecuniary penalties alone do not make a Bill a Money Bill. Which is correct?

    1. 1 only
    2. Both 1 and 2
    3. Neither 1 nor 2
    4. 2 only
    Show answer

    Correct answer: (D) 2 only

    Explanation

    Correct Answer: (D). Statement 2 follows the exclusions in Article 110(2). Statement 1 is incorrect because licence or service fees alone are also insufficient. Both types involve money but do not independently establish the constitutional category. Accepting both statements wrongly treats fees differently, while rejecting both overlooks the explicit exclusion for penalties.

  4. Q4. Who performs the certification role described in Article 110?

    1. Chairman of the Rajya Sabha
    2. Speaker of the Lok Sabha
    3. The sponsoring ministry alone
    4. A joint sitting of both Houses
    Show answer

    Correct answer: (B) Speaker of the Lok Sabha

    Explanation

    Correct Answer: (B). Article 110 assigns the Money Bill certification role to the Lok Sabha Speaker. The article distinguishes this institutional role from the substantive subject-matter test. The Rajya Sabha Chairman, sponsoring ministry and a joint sitting are not the certifying authority described. Their involvement elsewhere cannot replace the specific constitutional certification requirement.

  5. Q5. Where can a parliamentary Money Bill be introduced?

    1. In the Lok Sabha, not the Rajya Sabha
    2. In either House on identical terms
    3. Only in the Rajya Sabha
    4. Only at a joint sitting
    Show answer

    Correct answer: (A) In the Lok Sabha, not the Rajya Sabha

    Explanation

    Correct Answer: (A). Article 109 provides that a Money Bill cannot be introduced in the Rajya Sabha; introduction takes place in the Lok Sabha. The upper House later receives it for recommendations. Either-House introduction, exclusive Rajya Sabha introduction and joint-sitting introduction all contradict the special sequence. This procedure differs from ordinary bicameral passage.

  6. Q6. What is the Rajya Sabha role after receiving a Money Bill passed by the Lok Sabha?

    1. Amend it conclusively within six months
    2. Reject it permanently using an absolute veto
    3. Return it within fourteen days with recommendations
    4. Automatically require a joint sitting for every disagreement
    Show answer

    Correct answer: (C) Return it within fourteen days with recommendations

    Explanation

    Correct Answer: (C). The Rajya Sabha may recommend changes and must return the Bill within fourteen days. It does not have ordinary amendment or rejection powers on this route. Six months, an absolute veto and an automatic joint sitting all substitute procedures inconsistent with Article 109. Recommendations remain subject to the Lok Sabha decision.

  7. Q7. If the Rajya Sabha does not return a Money Bill within fourteen days, what follows?

    1. It lapses automatically
    2. It is deemed passed by both Houses in the Lok Sabha form
    3. It must be introduced again in the Rajya Sabha
    4. It is automatically sent to a joint sitting
    Show answer

    Correct answer: (B) It is deemed passed by both Houses in the Lok Sabha form

    Explanation

    Correct Answer: (B). Failure to return within fourteen days triggers deemed passage in the form approved by the Lok Sabha. The article does not provide automatic lapse, reintroduction in the Rajya Sabha or a joint sitting for this situation. These alternatives overlook the time-limited recommendatory role assigned to the upper House in the special procedure.

  8. Q8. Consider these statements: 1. The Lok Sabha may accept all, some or none of the Rajya Sabha recommendations. 2. A joint sitting is the Article 109 mechanism for resolving Money Bill disagreement. Which is correct?

    1. 2 only
    2. Both 1 and 2
    3. Neither 1 nor 2
    4. 1 only
    Show answer

    Correct answer: (D) 1 only

    Explanation

    Correct Answer: (D). Statement 1 is correct: the Lok Sabha decides which recommendations to accept. Statement 2 is incorrect because the Money Bill route has no joint sitting. Accepting both imports an ordinary legislative device into this special procedure. Rejecting both denies the decisive choice expressly assigned to the Lok Sabha after recommendations arrive.

  9. Q9. Which statement correctly distinguishes a financial Bill from a Money Bill?

    1. Financial provisions do not automatically qualify a Bill for the special Article 109 route
    2. Every financial Bill is necessarily a Money Bill
    3. Every financial Bill must receive only recommendatory Rajya Sabha scrutiny
    4. Article 117 makes the Article 110 subject test unnecessary
    Show answer

    Correct answer: (A) Financial provisions do not automatically qualify a Bill for the special Article 109 route

    Explanation

    Correct Answer: (A). Financial Bills can include broader matters and must follow their relevant constitutional category. They are not automatically Money Bills receiving Article 109 treatment. The other choices equate the categories, impose one Rajya Sabha role universally or discard the Article 110 test. Article 117 supplies related rules without eliminating that classification distinction.

  10. Q10. Under the distinction described in Article 111, which Bill is covered by the proviso allowing return for reconsideration?

    1. Every Money Bill exclusively
    2. Every Money Bill after fourteen days
    3. A Bill that is not a Money Bill
    4. A Money Bill whenever a joint sitting requests it
    Show answer

    Correct answer: (C) A Bill that is not a Money Bill

    Explanation

    Correct Answer: (C). The article states that the Article 111 proviso allowing return for reconsideration applies to a Bill that is not a Money Bill. The alternatives wrongly apply that proviso to Money Bills, invent a fourteen-day trigger or rely on a joint sitting. Fourteen days instead concerns Rajya Sabha consideration under Article 109.

More practice MCQ sets

All MCQ sets